CloudTalk

Tag: Business

  • Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    It’s a funny thing, seeing the tech world move at warp speed. You blink, and suddenly there’s a new contender, ready to shake things up. This time, it’s Gamma, the AI-powered presentation tool, making some serious waves.

    Notably, Gamma’s co-founder and CEO, Grant Lee, just announced some pretty impressive numbers. We’re talking about a $2.1 billion valuation and a cool $100 million in annual recurring revenue. That’s not chump change, right? It’s the kind of figures that make you sit up and take notice, especially in the competitive world of tech startups.

    And, you know, the whole thing got me thinking: could this be the beginning of the end for PowerPoint? I mean, PowerPoint has been the presentation software of choice for, well, pretty much everyone for decades. It’s in the DNA of business presentations, academic lectures, you name it.

    But Gamma? It’s different. It’s built on AI, designed to make creating presentations faster and, maybe, a little less painful. The whole pitch is about streamlining the process, making it easier to whip up something visually appealing without spending hours wrestling with design.

    The AI Factor

    The rise of AI has changed the landscape for all sorts of things, and the presentation game is no exception. It’s not just about automating the creation process. It’s also about changing the way we think about presentations.

    It seems like Gamma has tapped into something. People are looking for ways to work smarter, not harder. They want tools that can help them communicate their ideas effectively without getting bogged down in the technicalities of design. It’s a compelling vision, for sure.

    Back in the day, creating a decent presentation meant hours of work. You’d be fiddling with layouts, choosing fonts, and trying to make sure everything looked polished. But with AI, a lot of that heavy lifting can be automated. You feed the system your content, and it generates a presentation. That’s the promise, anyway.

    Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Now, I’m not saying PowerPoint is going to disappear overnight. It’s a behemoth, deeply entrenched in the way we work. But the fact that Gamma has reached such a high valuation, so quickly, it does make you wonder. It shows there’s a real appetite for something new, something different.

    And let’s be honest, PowerPoint can be… well, it can be a bit clunky sometimes. The interface isn’t always the most intuitive. It’s a tool that’s been around for a long time, and it shows. So, there’s a definite opening for a competitor that can offer a more modern, streamlined experience.

    Still, it’s a long shot, right? Taking on Microsoft is no small feat. But Gamma has momentum. They’re growing fast, and they’ve got some serious financial backing. The $100 million ARR is particularly telling. It shows that people are actually using the product and, presumably, finding value in it.

    What’s Next?

    So, what’s next for Gamma? That’s the big question. They’ve got the valuation, they’ve got the revenue, and they’ve got the buzz. The next step will be to keep growing, keep innovating, and keep chipping away at PowerPoint’s dominance.

    For now, it’s a fascinating story to watch unfold. It’s a reminder that the tech world is always changing, always evolving. And that the tools we use to communicate, to share ideas, are constantly being reimagined.

    You could say it’s a David versus Goliath story, but with a twist. It’s AI versus… well, you know.

  • Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    So, this is interesting, isn’t it? I was just reading about Gamma, the AI presentation tool that’s kind of being touted as a PowerPoint-killer. And it turns out, they’ve just hit a $2.1 billion valuation. That’s… a lot.

    Grant Lee, the co-founder and CEO, says they’ve also reached $100 million in ARR – annual recurring revenue. Which, if true, means they’re growing, and growing fast. The whole thing makes you wonder, is this the future of presentations? Is PowerPoint, this thing we’ve all grown up with, on its way out?

    Gamma, from what I understand, uses AI to help you create presentations. You feed it your content, and it spits out something visually appealing. It’s designed to be quick and easy, which, let’s be honest, is what a lot of us are looking for when we’re staring down the barrel of a presentation deadline.

    Notably, the technology category is seeing a lot of these kinds of startups. AI is, well, everywhere. And it makes sense that it would find its way into something like presentations. It’s a task that can be tedious, time-consuming. Anything that promises to make it easier is going to get a look.

    I mean, PowerPoint has been the default for so long. It’s what we all know. But it’s also… a bit clunky, isn’t it? A bit dated. It’s easy to see how something that’s built from the ground up with AI in mind could offer a real advantage. The ease of use is a big selling point, I’d imagine.

    And the numbers? $2.1 billion is serious money. It’s a sign that investors are seeing something here, that they believe in the potential of Gamma and its AI-powered approach. The $100 million ARR is another key data point. It suggests that people are actually using the product, and that they’re willing to pay for it.

    This is all happening in 2025, according to the TechCrunch report. So it’s not like this is some far-off future. It’s happening now. The startup world moves fast, and it looks like Gamma is leading the charge.

    I can’t help but wonder what this means for the future of work, too. Will presentations become easier, more streamlined? Will we all be using AI to create our slides in the coming years? It’s a bit of a shift, and it’s always interesting to see how technology changes the way we do things.

    Anyway, it’s just a thought. For now, it seems like Gamma is making a splash. And PowerPoint? Well, we’ll see.

  • Carbon Credit Market: Consolidation & Uncertainty

    Carbon Credit Market: Consolidation & Uncertainty

    So, the carbon credit market — it’s changing, isn’t it? Seems like just yesterday everyone was talking about the gold rush, and now? Well, now we’re seeing some serious consolidation. Carbon Direct is buying Pachama, and honestly, it feels like a turning point.

    It’s not exactly a surprise, though. The voluntary carbon markets have been, you know, a bit of a wild west. Lots of players, lots of different standards, and a whole lot of questions about the actual impact of it all. This move by Carbon Direct, though… it’s different. It’s like a signal that the big players are starting to really dig in, ready to shape the future.

    And what does that future look like? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it? The TechCrunch article, published November 10, 2025, points to a period of uncertainty. You can feel it, too. There’s a lot of scrutiny on carbon credits right now, with folks wondering if they’re actually doing what they claim to do. Are we really offsetting emissions? Or are we just, well, shuffling numbers around?

    The Players and the Stakes

    Carbon Direct, for those who don’t know, is a climate solutions company. Pachama? They’re all about using tech to verify and manage carbon offset projects. So, in a way, it makes sense. A company that provides the credits, merging with one that helps to validate them. It seems logical, you could say.

    But it’s bigger than that, I think. This whole thing is about trust. The voluntary carbon markets need it. They need it badly. If companies can’t trust the credits, they won’t buy them. If investors aren’t confident, they’ll pull back. And that would be a problem, wouldn’t it? Because these markets, in theory, are supposed to be a key part of the fight against climate change.

    What Does This Mean for the Future?

    So, what happens next? Well, we’ll probably see more of this. More mergers, more acquisitions. The market is maturing, and that means some players will inevitably get squeezed out. The stronger, more established companies, like Carbon Direct, will likely swallow up the smaller ones, or at least partner up.

    This consolidation could be a good thing, you know? It could lead to more standardization, more transparency. Maybe it’ll help to weed out some of the, let’s say, less credible projects. It could also mean that the cost of carbon credits goes up, as the market becomes more concentrated. That’s something to watch.

    And then there’s the whole issue of demand. Will companies continue to buy carbon credits? Will they be willing to pay more? It all depends on the regulations, the public perception, and, of course, the actual effectiveness of these projects. It’s a complex web, for sure.

    A Changing Landscape

    The TechCrunch piece mentions this shift, and I think it’s spot on. The article really captures that feeling of a market in flux. It’s a bit like watching a storm gather. You can see the clouds rolling in, the wind picking up. You know something big is about to happen, but you can’t quite predict where the lightning will strike.

    So, yeah, the carbon credit market. It’s a story that’s still being written. And right now, it feels like a chapter is closing, and a new one is just beginning. For now, we wait and see what the future holds.

  • Lenskart IPO: Stock Market Rollercoaster Ride

    Lenskart IPO: Stock Market Rollercoaster Ride

    There’s been a lot of buzz lately about Lenskart, the online eyewear giant, and their recent IPO. Honestly, the whole thing felt a little… wild. It’s not every day you see a company valued at nearly $8 billion go public, right?

    The first day on the stock market is always a nail-biter, and for Lenskart, it was no different. The opening wasn’t exactly a roaring success. The stock opened with a bit of a whimper, which definitely set some nerves on edge. You could feel the tension, I’m sure.

    But here’s where it gets interesting. Against the odds, Lenskart managed to pull things together. By the end of the day, the stock had clawed its way back, closing slightly above the IPO price. It wasn’t a massive jump, mind you, but it was enough to suggest that investors still had some faith in the company. And that’s saying something.

    Now, the whole situation got me thinking. The big question on everyone’s mind was whether that valuation was justified. $8 billion is a hefty price tag, and it definitely sparked a debate. Was it too high? Just right? Or maybe somewhere in between? The market, as it often does, seemed to be saying, “We’ll see.”

    Lenskart, if you don’t know, has built a pretty impressive business. They’ve disrupted the optics industry, offering a wide selection of eyewear online and through physical stores. They’ve got a strong brand and a loyal customer base. But the stock market is a fickle beast. What works in the business world doesn’t always translate to immediate success when you’re publicly listed.

    The first day performance is often a reflection of investor sentiment, the overall market conditions, and, let’s be honest, a bit of luck. Lenskart’s experience is a good reminder of how unpredictable the stock market can be. It’s a pretty wild ride.

    The public listing is a big step for any company. It brings in capital, yes, but it also brings a whole new level of scrutiny. Investors are watching, analysts are analyzing, and the pressure is on to perform. So, what happens next for Lenskart? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it?

    It’s easy to see why.

  • Gameskraft Layoffs: Real Money Gaming Ban’s Impact

    Gameskraft Layoffs: Real Money Gaming Ban’s Impact

    There’s been a bit of a shakeup in the gaming world, and honestly, it’s not looking great for everyone. Gameskraft, a gaming startup, is the latest to feel the pinch, and the story is, unfortunately, becoming all too familiar. The company is laying off a significant chunk of its workforce — a staggering 400 employees, to be exact. And the reason? Well, it all boils down to the ban on real money gaming (RMG) in the country.

    Now, if you’ve been following the business scene, this probably isn’t a huge surprise. The ban on RMG has been looming, and its impact is starting to ripple through the industry. Gameskraft, like many others, is now grappling with the fallout. It’s a tough situation, and it really highlights the challenges that startups face when the regulatory landscape shifts so dramatically.

    This whole thing is pretty wild, if you think about it. You have these companies, like Gameskraft, that are building something, creating jobs, and trying to innovate. Then, a ban comes down, and suddenly, everything changes. It’s not just about the financial hit, either. It’s about the people who lose their jobs, the projects that get put on hold, and the overall uncertainty that hangs over the industry.

    And it’s not just Gameskraft, either. The tags associated with this story, like “Real Money Gaming,” “Layoffs,” and “Gaming Industry,” are becoming unfortunately common headlines. It’s a sign of the times, and it’s a clear indication that the RMG ban is having a real, tangible effect on the businesses involved.

    Anyway, let’s talk about Gameskraft for a second. They’re a pretty big player in the gaming space, so this move is definitely going to send some shockwaves. I mean, 400 jobs is a lot. It means families affected, careers disrupted, and a lot of talented people suddenly looking for new opportunities. It’s a stark reminder that even in a booming industry, things can change in an instant.

    And the “why” is pretty straightforward: the ban on real money gaming. The government is cracking down, and companies that rely on this model are now struggling to stay afloat. It’s a classic case of policy having a direct, and often painful, impact on the business world.

    Now, what happens next? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it? Will more companies follow suit? Will the industry find a way to adapt? Or will this ban continue to reshape the gaming landscape? It’s hard to say for sure, but one thing is clear: the situation is still evolving.

    It’s a tough pill to swallow for the employees affected, and for the industry as a whole. It’s a reminder that the world of business is always shifting, and that even successful companies can face unexpected challenges. It is what it is.

  • Slow Ventures’ Finishing School: Etiquette for Founders

    Slow Ventures’ Finishing School: Etiquette for Founders

    There’s been a quiet shift happening. It seems like the venture capital world is getting, well, fancy. Or, at the very least, they want their founders to be. This week, Slow Ventures hosted a three-hour “Etiquette Finishing School.” Yep, you read that right. A finishing school. For startup founders.

    I know, right? Pretty wild. The whole thing was designed to help these founders learn to be… well, fancy. The curriculum? Everything from the perfect handshake to the nuances of public speaking and even office decorum. I’m picturing tiny forks and pinkies up, but I’m probably wrong.

    It’s a fascinating move, honestly. You’ve got these companies, these scrappy startups, building the future, and suddenly, they need a lesson in how to shake hands properly? It’s a bit of a culture clash, but maybe that’s the point. The world of venture capital has always had its own set of unspoken rules, and perhaps Slow Ventures is trying to help their founders navigate that world a little smoother.

    The goal, it seems, is to equip these founders with the tools they need to succeed not just in building a product or service, but also in the boardroom, at networking events, and, well, wherever else they might find themselves. Think about it: a polished founder is probably more likely to impress investors, land partnerships, and generally make a good impression. And in the world of startups, perception is often reality.

    This “Etiquette Finishing School” covered a lot of ground. The perfect handshake, which, let’s be honest, is a skill many of us could probably brush up on. Public speaking – a huge factor in whether a startup gets funded or not. And then there’s office decorum. I’m curious what that entailed. Were there lessons on how to arrange the succulents? How to avoid passive-aggressive sticky notes?

    Anyway, this whole thing got me thinking about the evolving definition of what it means to be a successful founder. For a long time, it was all about the hustle, the late nights, the ramen noodles, and the ability to code like a ninja. Now, it seems, there’s a new set of skills being valued. Soft skills, you might call them. The ability to network, to present yourself well, to navigate the social landscape of the business world.

    And it makes sense, right? As startups grow, founders have to step into a different role. They go from being the doers to the leaders, the visionaries, the faces of the company. And that requires a whole new set of skills. This is the new normal, it seems.

    Look, the “Finishing School” concept is unusual, but maybe it’s a sign of the times. It’s a signal that the venture capital world is becoming more sophisticated and that founders need to keep up. It’s an interesting concept, to say the least.

  • SoftBank’s AI Bet in Japan: Masterstroke or Hype?

    SoftBank’s AI Bet in Japan: Masterstroke or Hype?

    There’s a pretty interesting story unfolding in the tech world right now, and it involves two big names: SoftBank and OpenAI. They just announced a new joint venture, a 50-50 split, to sell enterprise AI tools in Japan. They’re calling it “Crystal Intelligence.” On the surface, it looks like a straightforward move: international expansion, tapping into a new market. But when you dig a little deeper, things get… well, a bit more complicated.

    See, SoftBank’s a major investor in OpenAI. That detail alone is enough to make you raise an eyebrow. It’s got people wondering if we’re seeing real economic value being created, or if this is just money being shuffled around within the AI hype cycle. That’s the question, isn’t it?

    It’s easy to get swept up in the AI frenzy. Every other day, there’s a new announcement, a new breakthrough, a new promise of how AI is going to change everything. But are we actually seeing tangible results? Or is it all just a lot of hot air, a bubble waiting to burst?

    Now, Japan is a smart choice for this venture. It’s a market with a strong appetite for new technologies, and a culture that values innovation. But it’s also a market that’s seen its fair share of tech hype, and it’s probably a bit more discerning than some. So, will Crystal Intelligence be able to break through the noise and deliver real value?

    The “who” is pretty clear: SoftBank and OpenAI. The “what” is enterprise AI tools, and the “where” is Japan. The “when” is right now. But the “why” is the real kicker. Why are they doing this? Is it about genuine innovation, or is it about keeping the hype machine running?

    Honestly, the whole thing feels a bit like a high-stakes game of musical chairs. Companies are pouring money into AI, and the valuations are soaring. But when the music stops… who’s going to be left holding the bag? SoftBank, with its history of big bets and sometimes mixed results, is definitely a player to watch.

    The AI Hype Cycle: A Quick Refresher

    If you’re not familiar with the AI hype cycle, it goes something like this: a new technology emerges, there’s a burst of excitement, everyone jumps on the bandwagon, valuations go through the roof, and then… reality sets in. The technology doesn’t live up to the hype, the bubble bursts, and things cool down. Then, eventually, the technology matures, finds its footing, and actually starts delivering real value. It’s happened with the internet, it’s happened with mobile phones, and it’s happening with AI.

    Right now, it feels like we’re somewhere in the middle of that cycle. The hype is still very much alive, but the cracks are starting to show. Some AI companies are struggling to generate revenue, some are facing ethical concerns, and some are just… overvalued.

    So, where does SoftBank and OpenAI’s new venture fit in? Is it a sign of things to come, a smart move to capitalize on the AI boom? Or is it a case of history repeating itself?

    It’s hard to say for sure, but it’s definitely a story worth following. The success or failure of Crystal Intelligence could tell us a lot about the future of AI, and whether the current hype is justified.

    It’s not just about the tech; it’s about the money, the expectations, and the long game. And honestly, it’s going to be fascinating to watch how this plays out.

    Anyway, that’s how it seems to me.

  • Cluely’s Roy Lee Signals Caution: Viral Hype Alone Isn’t Enough

    Cluely’s Roy Lee Signals Caution: Viral Hype Alone Isn’t Enough

    Cluely’s Roy Lee Signals Caution: Viral Hype Alone Isn’t Enough

    In the fast-paced world of startups, the allure of rapid growth and viral marketing campaigns often overshadows the more grounded aspects of business. However, a recent TechCrunch article suggests that even for a company like Cluely, a dose of reality may be setting in. The company’s CEO, Roy Lee, seems to be signaling a shift in focus, raising questions about the sustainability of growth fueled solely by hype.

    The Shift in Focus

    The core of the matter lies in a simple, yet telling, decision. Four months after publicly celebrating the startup’s rapid expansion, Roy Lee declined to share Cluely’s financial metrics. This reticence speaks volumes, especially in an industry that often prioritizes transparency, particularly when a company is seeking to establish credibility and attract investment. While the specifics of Cluely’s situation remain undisclosed, Lee’s actions raise legitimate concerns about the long-term viability of a business model that relies heavily on viral marketing and rapid growth.

    The move suggests that Lee and the Cluely team may recognize the limitations of focusing solely on the ‘what’ of startup growth, like the number of users or the rate of expansion. The ‘why’ behind the numbers – the financial health and sustainability of the business – is becoming increasingly important. Without solid financial metrics, the ‘how’ of long-term success remains uncertain.

    The Risks of Viral Hype

    Viral campaigns can generate significant buzz and attract a large user base quickly. However, this growth can be misleading if it isn’t supported by a solid business model. The absence of financial metrics can be interpreted as a lack of confidence in the company’s underlying value proposition or its ability to generate sustainable revenue. The ‘when’ of this shift in perspective is notable, occurring just four months after previous boasts of rapid growth. This timeframe suggests that Cluely may have experienced challenges that are prompting a more cautious approach.

    The business category is littered with examples of companies that achieved rapid user growth but failed due to unsustainable business models. Without a clear path to profitability and a healthy financial foundation, even the most successful viral campaigns can lead to a dead end. This is a critical lesson for Cluely and other startups that are riding the wave of initial success.

    The Importance of Financial Transparency

    In the current business landscape, financial transparency is no longer optional; it’s a necessity. Investors, partners, and even customers want to know the ‘why’ behind a company’s success. A refusal to share financial metrics can damage trust and make it difficult to secure further investment or build lasting relationships. For Cluely, the decision to withhold this information may be a strategic move to manage expectations, but it could also signal underlying issues that need to be addressed.

    Roy Lee’s actions, while potentially prudent, underscore the importance of balancing growth with financial stability. The ‘who’ – in this case, Roy Lee and Cluely – are navigating the complexities of the startup world, and their decisions will likely be closely watched by investors and industry observers alike. As the business world evolves, the ability to build a sustainable and profitable enterprise will be more important than ever.

    Conclusion

    Cluely’s situation serves as a cautionary tale for startups everywhere. While viral hype can be a powerful tool for initial growth, it’s not a substitute for a solid business model and robust financial performance. Roy Lee’s decision to withhold financial metrics is a clear indication that Cluely is focusing on the ‘why’ behind its success. The long-term trajectory of the company will depend on its ability to navigate the challenges of sustainable growth in a competitive environment.

  • Space Defense CEO: From Air Force to True Anomaly

    Space Defense CEO: From Air Force to True Anomaly

    From Air Force Officer to Space Defense CEO: Even Rogers’ Mission

    The final frontier has a new warrior. Even Rogers, a former Air Force weapons officer, traded his military uniform for the role of CEO, embarking on a mission to safeguard space. His journey, as detailed in a recent TechCrunch article, exemplifies a growing trend: the convergence of military expertise and entrepreneurial drive in the realm of space defense.

    A Decade of Observation

    Rogers’ decision wasn’t made on a whim. For a decade, he served as an Air Force weapons officer, a front-row seat to the evolving landscape of space-based weaponry. His primary observation? China and Russia were actively building their space arsenals, while the United States lagged behind, possessing, in his words, “nothing in our arsenal.” This disparity served as the catalyst for his career shift. (Source: Startups | TechCrunch)

    The Birth of True Anomaly

    Driven by a sense of urgency and a commitment to national security, Rogers left the military to address the issue directly. He co-founded True Anomaly, a company dedicated exclusively to space superiority. The company is developing autonomous spacecraft, sensors, and software. The mission of True Anomaly is to design technologies specifically tailored for military engagements in orbit. This represents a significant shift in the space industry, moving away from purely commercial ventures towards a defense-focused approach.

    The Why Behind the What

    The ‘why’ is clear: to counteract the advancements of China and Russia in space weaponization. The ‘what’ encompasses the development of sophisticated technology designed to maintain dominance in orbit. This includes the creation of autonomous spacecraft, advanced sensors, and specialized software. The ‘how’ involves leveraging Rogers’ extensive experience as an Air Force weapons officer, combined with the agility and innovation of a startup environment.

    This approach allows True Anomaly to rapidly develop and deploy cutting-edge solutions, filling a critical gap in the U.S. defense capabilities. Rogers’ transition from military service to the helm of a space defense company underscores the growing importance of protecting assets in orbit and ensuring the U.S. maintains its strategic advantage.

    The Future of Space Defense

    Rogers’ story is a testament to the power of vision and determination. He recognized a critical need and took decisive action to address it. True Anomaly, under his leadership, is poised to become a key player in the evolving landscape of space defense. The company’s focus on autonomous spacecraft, integrated with cutting-edge sensors and software, positions it at the forefront of this technological arms race.

    The work of Rogers and True Anomaly is a clear example of how military expertise can translate into entrepreneurial success and contribute to national security in the face of evolving threats.

  • Goldman Sachs Fuels MoEngage’s Global Expansion

    Goldman Sachs Fuels MoEngage’s Global Expansion

    Goldman Sachs Bets Big: Fuels MoEngage’s Global Expansion

    In a significant vote of confidence, Goldman Sachs has increased its investment in MoEngage, a marketing automation platform. This new round of funding, announced on November 4, 2025, is set to propel MoEngage’s global expansion, building on its already impressive reach across 75 countries. The investment underscores the growing importance of sophisticated customer engagement strategies in today’s business landscape.

    The Investment and Its Significance

    The decision by Goldman Sachs to ‘double down’ on MoEngage highlights the firm’s belief in the platform’s potential for continued growth. This additional funding will serve as a catalyst, enabling MoEngage to strengthen its position in existing markets and penetrate new ones. The ‘how’ of this expansion likely involves strategic hiring, product development, and increased marketing efforts to reach a wider audience. The ‘why’ is clear: to capitalize on the increasing demand for effective customer engagement solutions.

    MoEngage’s success thus far, particularly in North America, has been a key driver for this additional investment. This region currently represents the company’s largest market, demonstrating the strong demand for its services. The platform offers a range of features designed to help businesses understand their customers better and deliver personalized experiences across various channels.

    MoEngage’s Global Footprint

    MoEngage’s presence in 75 countries speaks volumes about its ability to adapt and cater to diverse markets. The platform’s ability to provide localized solutions and support is critical to its international success. The company’s expansion strategy appears to prioritize regions with high growth potential, leveraging data and analytics to inform its decisions.

    The ‘what’ of MoEngage’s offering is a comprehensive marketing automation platform. This includes features for customer segmentation, campaign management, and performance analytics. This allows businesses to streamline their marketing efforts and achieve better results. The ‘where’ of their operations spans across the globe, with a significant focus on North America as a key growth driver.

    Implications for the Future

    This investment from Goldman Sachs is more than just a financial boost; it’s a strategic partnership that provides MoEngage with valuable resources and expertise. This collaboration will likely lead to further innovation, allowing MoEngage to stay ahead of the curve in the rapidly evolving marketing technology space.

    The ‘when’ of this announcement, November 4, 2025, marks a pivotal moment for MoEngage. As the company continues its global expansion journey, the support of Goldman Sachs will be crucial. The venture capital backing provides the necessary fuel for this expansion, enabling MoEngage to reach new heights and solidify its position as a leader in the marketing automation industry.

    Source: TechCrunch