CloudTalk

Blog

  • Eternos’ Pivot: AI That Sounds Like You, $10.3M Funding

    So, Eternos. Remember them? They were the immortality startup, right? Well, it seems things have shifted a bit. Now, they’re pivoting, moving away from, you know, the whole ‘eternal life’ thing. Instead, they’re focusing on something a bit more… personal. A personal AI that’s designed to sound like you.

    It’s a pretty big change, you could say. From trying to beat death to, well, creating a digital you. I guess it makes sense, in a way. The dream of immortality is huge, but maybe a digital echo is a more… achievable first step?

    Notably, the company, now called Uare.ai, just snagged $10.3 million in seed funding. Mayfield and Boldstart Ventures led the round, as per the TechCrunch report. That’s a decent chunk of change, and it shows there’s still a lot of investor interest in this space, even if the focus has changed.

    The shift is interesting, though. Back in the day, the idea of immortality startups was all the rage. Now, it seems like the focus is on creating something… more immediate. Something that can be used, interacted with, right now. This ‘personal AI’ angle feels very… 2025, doesn’t it?

    I wonder how it works, exactly. Will it be like a super-advanced chatbot? Or something more? Will it mimic your voice, your mannerisms, your… soul? That’s the big question, I think. How do you capture a person in an AI?

    The article doesn’t say much about the ‘how,’ just the ‘what’ and the ‘who.’ Uare.ai, backed by some serious funding, is now firmly in the personal AI game. The tags mention AI, funding, and the startup, of course. Those are the basics. But the real story is in the shift, the pivot.

    Earlier, the goal was eternal life. Now? It seems they’re aiming for something a bit closer to home. Something that, in a way, feels more… human. You could say it’s a reflection of where the tech industry is moving. It’s definitely a sign of the times.

    The funding itself is a signal. Boldstart Ventures and Mayfield saw something in this new direction. They saw potential in a personal AI, in a digital you. It makes you wonder what they know that we don’t, right? What’s the killer app for a digital self? What will people *do* with it?

    And it’s not just about the tech. It’s about what we value. What we want to preserve. It’s probably a bit of both. Maybe it’s about legacy. About leaving something behind. Or maybe it’s just about having someone to talk to, even when you’re not around.

    Still. It’s a fascinating pivot. From trying to conquer death to trying to… replicate life. In a way, it’s a more humble goal. But maybe, just maybe, it’s also a more profound one.

    For now, Uare.ai is building its future, one seed round at a time. And the rest of us? Well, we wait and see what a digital ‘us’ looks like.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • AI Startups: Nailing Product-Market Fit

    AI Startups: Nailing Product-Market Fit

    It’s a question that’s probably been on the minds of every AI startup founder: How do you actually *nail* product-market fit? I was reading a piece over on TechCrunch the other day — dated November 11, 2025, if you’re keeping track — and it got me thinking. The article, which I’ll link below, featured insights from a couple of investors who’ve seen a thing or two.

    They’re not just throwing around buzzwords, either. It’s practical stuff. They talk about what founders and operators should be focusing on. About how to avoid some of the classic pitfalls. The whole product-market fit thing… it’s a journey, right?

    Notably, the article really drove home the idea that AI startups, in particular, face unique challenges. The technology is new, the landscape is shifting constantly, and the expectations are… well, they’re pretty high. So, how do you even begin to approach something like that?

    The Core Questions

    One of the first things the investors highlighted was the need to really understand your customer. Who are they? What problems are they *actually* trying to solve? It sounds simple, but you’d be surprised how many startups get this wrong, especially in the AI space. They get caught up in the technology itself, in the potential, and they forget to listen to what the market is telling them.

    The investors stressed that product-market fit isn’t a one-time thing. It’s an ongoing process. It’s about iterating, testing, and adapting. You build something, you get feedback, you adjust. And you keep doing that until you find something that resonates.

    This means being willing to pivot, too. To change your approach if something isn’t working. That can be tough, especially if you’ve poured your heart and soul into something. But sometimes, it’s necessary.

    Focusing on the Real Problems

    The best AI startups, the article suggested, are the ones that aren’t just building cool tech. They’re building solutions to real problems. Problems that people are willing to pay to solve. It’s about finding that sweet spot where your technology meets a genuine need.

    And it’s not always about the flashiest AI. Sometimes, the most effective solutions are the ones that are the most practical, the most user-friendly, and the ones that deliver the best results. That’s the core of product-market fit, right?

    The investors also touched on the importance of building a strong team. A team that can execute the vision, adapt to change, and keep pushing forward. It’s a key ingredient, you could say.

    Beyond the Tech

    One thing that resonated with me was the idea that product-market fit isn’t just about the product itself. It’s about the whole experience. It’s about how easy it is to use, how well it integrates with other systems, and the level of support you provide. It’s everything, really.

    This article, and the investors’ insights, really make you think. It’s not just about the technology, it’s about the people. It’s about the market, and the need. AI startups, like any startup, need to remember that at their core.

    So, the next time you hear someone talking about AI and product-market fit, remember: it’s a journey. A complex one, sure, but also a really exciting one. And the best AI startups are the ones that are prepared to go the distance.

    For now, it’s a reminder that the best technology solves real problems.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Planning Ahead: How Founders Can Prep for Late-Stage Funding

    Planning Ahead: How Founders Can Prep for Late-Stage Funding

    It’s funny, isn’t it? How much of the startup game is about looking ahead. The article I read today, from TechCrunch, really drove that home. It’s all about late-stage fundraises, and how founders can, and really should, start preparing from day one. Seems obvious, but it’s easy to get caught up in the weeds, you know?

    The core idea? Start building those relationships *now*. I mean, if you’re a startup, you probably have a million things on your plate. But the piece really emphasizes that forging connections with late-stage investors early on is crucial. It’s like planting seeds in a garden. You don’t wait until the harvest to start, right?

    Notably, the piece doesn’t just say ‘network.’ It’s more nuanced. It’s about understanding what late-stage investors look for. They’re not just throwing money around; they want to see a clear path to returns. So, it’s not just about knowing names; it’s about understanding their investment theses, their portfolios, what they value. That takes time, it takes research, and it takes… well, it takes the kind of foresight that separates the good founders from the great.

    And it makes sense when you think about it. Late-stage investors are, by definition, looking at more mature companies. They want to see traction, revenue, a solid business model. They’re not taking big risks, so your groundwork has to be rock solid. This means having a clear narrative, a compelling story that resonates with *their* priorities.

    Earlier this week, I was talking to a friend who is a founder. He’s in the thick of it – early stage, trying to get off the ground. He was so focused on the immediate, on getting that initial seed round. And, you know, that’s understandable. But the TechCrunch article kind of nudged me to think: what if he also started, in a small way, to build those relationships for the future? Not in a pushy, desperate way, but in a smart, strategic way.

    It’s not just about the money, either. The article kind of implies that the right investors bring more than just capital. They bring experience, connections of their own, and a deeper understanding of the market. They can help you navigate the tricky waters of scaling up. You get that, and you’re set.

    Still. It’s a balancing act, right? You’re building a company, dealing with the daily grind, and then you have to think about the *future* future. But, in a way, it’s also about changing your mindset. It’s about seeing the whole field, not just the immediate patch in front of you.

    The article also touched on the idea of transparency. Late-stage investors want to see the whole picture. They want to understand the risks, the challenges, the potential roadblocks. So, it’s about being upfront, honest, and building trust. You’re not just selling a dream; you’re building a partnership.

    And, you know, I think that’s the real takeaway. It’s not just about getting the funding. It’s about building a solid foundation, a sustainable business, and a relationship built on mutual respect. It’s a long game, and the best players are always thinking a few steps ahead.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Planning Ahead: Prep for Late-Stage Funding as a Founder

    You know, it’s funny — or maybe not, depending on your perspective — how much of the startup world revolves around the future. Always looking ahead. What’s next, what’s the big play, who’s going to be the next big thing. And, in that context, something I’ve been thinking about is how founders can actually prepare for those late-stage fundraises, like, right from the jump.

    It’s a bit counterintuitive, I guess. You’re just getting off the ground, maybe still figuring out your product-market fit, and someone’s telling you to start thinking about the Series C or D. But, according to a recent piece I read, it makes a lot of sense. The core idea? Start building those relationships with late-stage investors *now*.

    The piece, from TechCrunch, really drove this home. It’s all about forging connections. About making sure that when the time comes, you’re not cold-calling. You’re not some random startup hoping to get on their radar. You’re someone they already know, someone they’ve been watching, someone they trust. And that takes time.

    It seems like the whole game has changed, in a way. Back in the day, you’d focus on the early-stage rounds, get your seed funding, maybe a Series A, and then, as you grew, you’d start thinking about the bigger players. Now, though? The smart founders are looking at the whole landscape, right from the start. They’re thinking about the endgame, even when they’re just starting out.

    And it’s not just about the money, either. Sure, late-stage funding is about the big checks, the valuations, the potential for an exit. But it’s also about the expertise, the networks, the guidance that these investors can bring to the table. They’ve seen it all before. They know the pitfalls, the challenges, the things that can make or break a company. So, having them in your corner early on? That’s gold.

    I mean, think about it. If you’re a startup, you’re probably juggling a million things. Building the product, finding customers, hiring a team, and, of course, raising capital. It’s a lot. And the temptation is always to focus on the immediate needs, the things that are right in front of you. But, as the article points out, that’s where the long game comes in.

    It’s about attending the right industry events, maybe even speaking at them. It’s about reaching out to investors, not with a pitch deck in hand, but just to say hello, to start a conversation. It’s about sharing your progress, your insights, your vision. It’s about building a relationship, not just a transaction. These are all things that the most successful founders are doing, even while they’re still in the early stages of their journey.

    And the advice from the article is pretty simple, actually: Be patient. Be persistent. Be genuine. Late-stage investors are busy people. They get pitched all day, every day. So, you have to stand out, in a way that’s not just about the numbers. It’s about the connection, the trust, the belief in what you’re building. It’s about showing them that you’re in it for the long haul.

    You could say that it’s a bit like planting a tree. You don’t see the fruit right away. You have to nurture it, water it, give it time to grow. But, eventually, if you do it right, you’ll have something strong, something lasting, something that can bear fruit for years to come. That’s the feeling I got from reading the article.

    So, yeah, it’s a good reminder. For startups, for founders, for anyone building something from the ground up: think ahead. Think about the future. And start building those relationships now, even when it feels like you’re still just getting started. It might just make all the difference when the time comes. I guess that’s the takeaway.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • AWS Backup Now Supports EKS: Simplified Kubernetes Backups

    AWS Backup Now Supports EKS: Simplified Kubernetes Backups

    So, AWS Backup now plays nice with Amazon EKS. It’s a pretty big deal, actually. For anyone running Kubernetes clusters on AWS, this new support offers a simpler way to handle backups and restores. No more wrestling with custom scripts or third-party tools.

    It kind of feels like AWS is saying, “We got you.” And you know, in the world of cloud computing, that’s a welcome message. The whole idea is to make things easier, right? To let you focus on what matters – your applications, your users, your business – instead of getting bogged down in the nitty-gritty of data protection.

    The core of the announcement is that AWS Backup now provides a fully managed, centralized solution. Centralized is key here. It means you can manage backups for your EKS clusters alongside all your other AWS resources from a single place. That alone is a win for anyone who’s ever had to jump between different consoles or systems.

    And it’s not just about the convenience. Think about the security implications. Having a reliable backup and restore strategy is fundamental for any production system, especially when dealing with something as complex as Kubernetes. If something goes wrong – a configuration error, a security breach, whatever – you need a way to get back on your feet quickly. AWS Backup is designed to help you do just that.

    Notably, the press release highlighted the ease of use. You don’t need to be a Kubernetes expert to back up and restore your clusters. You can use the same familiar AWS Backup console and APIs you’re already using for other services. That’s always a plus. Lowering the barrier to entry means more people can take advantage of these essential security practices.

    It’s worth mentioning that the support covers both the cluster itself and the application data running inside it. So, you’re not just backing up the control plane; you’re protecting everything that makes your applications tick. That’s comprehensive.

    Earlier, managing EKS backups often involved stitching together various tools and scripts. This new integration streamlines the process, making it more efficient and less prone to errors. It’s a move that should make life easier for DevOps teams and anyone responsible for maintaining the health and security of their EKS environments.

    In a way, this is just another piece of the puzzle. AWS is constantly adding new features and services to make the cloud a safer, more manageable place. This new support for Amazon EKS in AWS Backup is a good example of that ongoing effort. It reflects a shift towards providing more integrated, user-friendly solutions, which is a trend I think we’ll continue to see.

    For now, it seems like a solid step forward, simplifying a critical aspect of cloud operations. And that’s always something to appreciate.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    It’s a funny thing, seeing the tech world move at warp speed. You blink, and suddenly there’s a new contender, ready to shake things up. This time, it’s Gamma, the AI-powered presentation tool, making some serious waves.

    Notably, Gamma’s co-founder and CEO, Grant Lee, just announced some pretty impressive numbers. We’re talking about a $2.1 billion valuation and a cool $100 million in annual recurring revenue. That’s not chump change, right? It’s the kind of figures that make you sit up and take notice, especially in the competitive world of tech startups.

    And, you know, the whole thing got me thinking: could this be the beginning of the end for PowerPoint? I mean, PowerPoint has been the presentation software of choice for, well, pretty much everyone for decades. It’s in the DNA of business presentations, academic lectures, you name it.

    But Gamma? It’s different. It’s built on AI, designed to make creating presentations faster and, maybe, a little less painful. The whole pitch is about streamlining the process, making it easier to whip up something visually appealing without spending hours wrestling with design.

    The AI Factor

    The rise of AI has changed the landscape for all sorts of things, and the presentation game is no exception. It’s not just about automating the creation process. It’s also about changing the way we think about presentations.

    It seems like Gamma has tapped into something. People are looking for ways to work smarter, not harder. They want tools that can help them communicate their ideas effectively without getting bogged down in the technicalities of design. It’s a compelling vision, for sure.

    Back in the day, creating a decent presentation meant hours of work. You’d be fiddling with layouts, choosing fonts, and trying to make sure everything looked polished. But with AI, a lot of that heavy lifting can be automated. You feed the system your content, and it generates a presentation. That’s the promise, anyway.

    Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Now, I’m not saying PowerPoint is going to disappear overnight. It’s a behemoth, deeply entrenched in the way we work. But the fact that Gamma has reached such a high valuation, so quickly, it does make you wonder. It shows there’s a real appetite for something new, something different.

    And let’s be honest, PowerPoint can be… well, it can be a bit clunky sometimes. The interface isn’t always the most intuitive. It’s a tool that’s been around for a long time, and it shows. So, there’s a definite opening for a competitor that can offer a more modern, streamlined experience.

    Still, it’s a long shot, right? Taking on Microsoft is no small feat. But Gamma has momentum. They’re growing fast, and they’ve got some serious financial backing. The $100 million ARR is particularly telling. It shows that people are actually using the product and, presumably, finding value in it.

    What’s Next?

    So, what’s next for Gamma? That’s the big question. They’ve got the valuation, they’ve got the revenue, and they’ve got the buzz. The next step will be to keep growing, keep innovating, and keep chipping away at PowerPoint’s dominance.

    For now, it’s a fascinating story to watch unfold. It’s a reminder that the tech world is always changing, always evolving. And that the tools we use to communicate, to share ideas, are constantly being reimagined.

    You could say it’s a David versus Goliath story, but with a twist. It’s AI versus… well, you know.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    Gamma’s $2.1B Valuation: Is PowerPoint Doomed?

    So, this is interesting, isn’t it? I was just reading about Gamma, the AI presentation tool that’s kind of being touted as a PowerPoint-killer. And it turns out, they’ve just hit a $2.1 billion valuation. That’s… a lot.

    Grant Lee, the co-founder and CEO, says they’ve also reached $100 million in ARR – annual recurring revenue. Which, if true, means they’re growing, and growing fast. The whole thing makes you wonder, is this the future of presentations? Is PowerPoint, this thing we’ve all grown up with, on its way out?

    Gamma, from what I understand, uses AI to help you create presentations. You feed it your content, and it spits out something visually appealing. It’s designed to be quick and easy, which, let’s be honest, is what a lot of us are looking for when we’re staring down the barrel of a presentation deadline.

    Notably, the technology category is seeing a lot of these kinds of startups. AI is, well, everywhere. And it makes sense that it would find its way into something like presentations. It’s a task that can be tedious, time-consuming. Anything that promises to make it easier is going to get a look.

    I mean, PowerPoint has been the default for so long. It’s what we all know. But it’s also… a bit clunky, isn’t it? A bit dated. It’s easy to see how something that’s built from the ground up with AI in mind could offer a real advantage. The ease of use is a big selling point, I’d imagine.

    And the numbers? $2.1 billion is serious money. It’s a sign that investors are seeing something here, that they believe in the potential of Gamma and its AI-powered approach. The $100 million ARR is another key data point. It suggests that people are actually using the product, and that they’re willing to pay for it.

    This is all happening in 2025, according to the TechCrunch report. So it’s not like this is some far-off future. It’s happening now. The startup world moves fast, and it looks like Gamma is leading the charge.

    I can’t help but wonder what this means for the future of work, too. Will presentations become easier, more streamlined? Will we all be using AI to create our slides in the coming years? It’s a bit of a shift, and it’s always interesting to see how technology changes the way we do things.

    Anyway, it’s just a thought. For now, it seems like Gamma is making a splash. And PowerPoint? Well, we’ll see.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • AWS Weekly Roundup: Anticipating re:Invent 2025

    AWS Weekly Roundup: Anticipating re:Invent 2025

    Alright, so it’s that time of year again, isn’t it? The AWS Weekly Roundup just dropped, and it’s got me thinking about re:Invent 2025. Seems like it was just last year, but already, we’re only three weeks away.

    I remember last year’s re:Invent. Sixty thousand people descended on Las Vegas, Nevada. The atmosphere? Electric. You could feel the buzz everywhere, from the keynote sessions to the late-night networking events. It’s a huge deal for the AWS community, a real gathering of minds.

    This year, the anticipation is building. I’m already looking forward to the new launches and announcements. That’s always the highlight, right? Seeing what AWS has been cooking up, how they’re pushing the boundaries of cloud computing.

    Notably, the roundup touches on some key areas. There’s the usual updates on Amazon S3, which is always evolving, always getting better. Then, of course, Amazon EC2, the workhorse of the AWS infrastructure. They’re constantly refining those services, making them more powerful, more efficient.

    But re:Invent is more than just product updates, though. It’s about the whole experience. The chance to connect with other AWS users, the deep dives into new technologies, the keynotes that set the tone for the coming year. It’s a place to learn, to network, and to get inspired.

    I’m also wondering what this year’s conference will bring. What new innovations will be unveiled? What trends will dominate the conversations? It’s always a bit of a guessing game, but that’s part of the fun, you know?

    Meanwhile, registration is still open. If you’re considering going, I’d say, do it. It’s an investment in yourself, in your career. It’s a chance to learn from the best, to see what the future holds, and to be a part of something big.

    I’m already mentally preparing for the trip, you could say. Booking flights, making a list of sessions, and, most importantly, getting ready to soak it all in. It’s a lot to take in, but that’s the point, isn’t it? To be immersed in the world of AWS, even if it’s just for a few days.

    It’s funny, the whole thing. The sheer scale of it. All those people, all those announcements, all that energy. It’s a bit overwhelming, in a good way. You walk away feeling energized, ready to take on the world. Or, at least, ready to take on the next cloud project.

    For now, I’m just looking forward to it. Three weeks. It’ll be here before we know it.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Carbon Credit Market: Consolidation & Uncertainty

    Carbon Credit Market: Consolidation & Uncertainty

    So, the carbon credit market — it’s changing, isn’t it? Seems like just yesterday everyone was talking about the gold rush, and now? Well, now we’re seeing some serious consolidation. Carbon Direct is buying Pachama, and honestly, it feels like a turning point.

    It’s not exactly a surprise, though. The voluntary carbon markets have been, you know, a bit of a wild west. Lots of players, lots of different standards, and a whole lot of questions about the actual impact of it all. This move by Carbon Direct, though… it’s different. It’s like a signal that the big players are starting to really dig in, ready to shape the future.

    And what does that future look like? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it? The TechCrunch article, published November 10, 2025, points to a period of uncertainty. You can feel it, too. There’s a lot of scrutiny on carbon credits right now, with folks wondering if they’re actually doing what they claim to do. Are we really offsetting emissions? Or are we just, well, shuffling numbers around?

    The Players and the Stakes

    Carbon Direct, for those who don’t know, is a climate solutions company. Pachama? They’re all about using tech to verify and manage carbon offset projects. So, in a way, it makes sense. A company that provides the credits, merging with one that helps to validate them. It seems logical, you could say.

    But it’s bigger than that, I think. This whole thing is about trust. The voluntary carbon markets need it. They need it badly. If companies can’t trust the credits, they won’t buy them. If investors aren’t confident, they’ll pull back. And that would be a problem, wouldn’t it? Because these markets, in theory, are supposed to be a key part of the fight against climate change.

    What Does This Mean for the Future?

    So, what happens next? Well, we’ll probably see more of this. More mergers, more acquisitions. The market is maturing, and that means some players will inevitably get squeezed out. The stronger, more established companies, like Carbon Direct, will likely swallow up the smaller ones, or at least partner up.

    This consolidation could be a good thing, you know? It could lead to more standardization, more transparency. Maybe it’ll help to weed out some of the, let’s say, less credible projects. It could also mean that the cost of carbon credits goes up, as the market becomes more concentrated. That’s something to watch.

    And then there’s the whole issue of demand. Will companies continue to buy carbon credits? Will they be willing to pay more? It all depends on the regulations, the public perception, and, of course, the actual effectiveness of these projects. It’s a complex web, for sure.

    A Changing Landscape

    The TechCrunch piece mentions this shift, and I think it’s spot on. The article really captures that feeling of a market in flux. It’s a bit like watching a storm gather. You can see the clouds rolling in, the wind picking up. You know something big is about to happen, but you can’t quite predict where the lightning will strike.

    So, yeah, the carbon credit market. It’s a story that’s still being written. And right now, it feels like a chapter is closing, and a new one is just beginning. For now, we wait and see what the future holds.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode

  • Knicks’ Miles McBride Launches ‘Mmotion’ App

    So, a new app just dropped, and it’s got a pretty interesting backstory. Miles McBride, the guard for the New York Knicks, is stepping into the tech arena with his own creation: an app called “Mmotion.” The buzz is, it’s aiming to be a contender in the location-sharing space, giving Snap Map a run for its money. It launched on November 10, 2025, according to TechCrunch, which is always a good place to start when you’re trying to get the scoop on the latest tech.

    It’s not just another location tracker, though. Mmotion is trying to blend that whole “where are you?” vibe with social discovery. The idea? Find people nearby who share your interests. You know, maybe you’re into indie music, or perhaps you’re a serious foodie. The app, it seems, wants to connect you with like-minded folks in your area. That’s the core of it.

    You could say it’s a bit of a pivot from the court to the code, right? McBride, known for his hustle on the court, is now trying to bring that same energy to the app world. It’s a move that’s definitely raising eyebrows, and for good reason. Athletes getting involved in tech isn’t exactly new, but it’s always interesting to see how they approach it. They bring a different perspective, you know?

    Notably, the app is focusing on friendship. The whole idea is to help you connect with people. It’s not just about showing where you are. It’s about finding your people, which is a pretty cool concept when you think about it. It’s a space that’s seen a lot of activity in recent years, with apps like Snap Map already established. So, Mmotion is stepping into a crowded market, that’s for sure.

    How Does It Work?

    Well, from what I’ve gathered, Mmotion combines location sharing with social discovery features. It’s a way to see where your friends are while also finding people nearby who share your interests. That’s the gist of it. It’s a pretty straightforward concept, but the execution is key, of course. The app will have to nail down the user experience, the algorithm, and all the stuff that makes an app sticky, so people keep coming back.

    The tech world moves fast, and competition is fierce. Snap Map has a huge user base, so Mmotion has its work cut out for it. It’s going to be interesting to see how it all plays out. The article on TechCrunch didn’t go into a ton of detail about the specific features, but the idea is clear: it’s all about connecting people.

    The Bigger Picture

    This whole thing is kind of a reflection of how intertwined sports and tech have become. Athletes are no longer just athletes; they’re brands, and they’re entrepreneurs. McBride’s move with Mmotion is a perfect example. It’s a way to diversify, to build something new, and to leverage his platform. It’s a smart move in a way, especially if the app takes off. And, hey, even if it doesn’t, it’s a learning experience, right?

    The app landscape is always evolving. New apps pop up all the time, and some stick around while others fade away. It’s a gamble, but it’s also exciting. I mean, who knows? Maybe Mmotion will be the next big thing. Or maybe it won’t. But the fact that someone like Miles McBride is putting his name and effort behind it makes it worth watching.

    For now, Mmotion is out there, trying to find its place in the world. It’s a story about a basketball player, a new app, and the ever-changing world of technology. And honestly, it’s a story about connection.

    🎙️ Latest Podcast

    Always plays the latest podcast episode